Iceland vs Latvia: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of

Iceland
46 Percentage of median disposable household income
in 2025
Latvia
16 Percentage of median disposable household income
in 2025
Iceland rank
2nd
Latvia rank
5th

Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of over time

  • Iceland
  • Latvia
1020304050200120132025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 46 Percentage of median disposable household income against 16 Percentage of median disposable household income in Latvia, a difference of 30 Percentage of median disposable household income.

That makes Iceland's figure about 2.9 times Latvia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 5th of 31 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 42 Percentage of median disposable household income 14.4 Percentage of median disposable household income 27.6 Percentage of median disposable household income Iceland
2010s 48.1 Percentage of median disposable household income 14.5 Percentage of median disposable household income 33.6 Percentage of median disposable household income Iceland
2020s 46.5 Percentage of median disposable household income 12.67 Percentage of median disposable household income 33.83 Percentage of median disposable household income Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of, Iceland or Latvia?
Iceland, at 46 Percentage of median disposable household income against 16 Percentage of median disposable household income in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of between Iceland and Latvia?
30 Percentage of median disposable household income, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Latvia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Latvia rank globally for adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of?
Iceland ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 5th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of selected jobless families that claim minimum income benefits. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Latvia: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adequacy-of-minimum-income-benefits-net-annualised-income-of-selected-jobless-families/iceland/latvia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adequacy-of-minimum-income-benefits-net-annualised-income-of-selected-jobless-families/iceland/latvia-2/">Iceland vs Latvia: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of selected jobless families that claim minimum income benefits
Unit
Percentage of median disposable household income
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
41 places, 934 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

This indicator measures the income of selected jobless families receiving Minimum Income benefits. Values are expressed both in national currency and as a percentage of the median disposable income in the country. When the country's poverty line is defined as a fixed percentage of the median disposable income, the normalization of benefit amounts in terms of the median disposable income allows measuring the gap between benefit entitlements and the poverty line. For instance, if the poverty threshold is 50% of the median disposable income, a value of the indicator of 30% means that benefit entitlements are 20 percentage points below the poverty line. Calculations for families with children assume 2 children aged 4 and 6 who do not use formal childcare.