Croatia vs Japan: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of

Croatia
14 Percentage of median disposable household income
in 2025
Japan
42 Percentage of median disposable household income
in 2024
Croatia rank
2nd
Japan rank
4th

Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of over time

  • Croatia
  • Japan
1020304050200120132025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 42 Percentage of median disposable household income against 14 Percentage of median disposable household income in Croatia, a difference of 28 Percentage of median disposable household income.

That makes Japan's figure about 3.0 times Croatia's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 2nd and Japan ranks 4th of 3 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Japan Difference Ahead
2010s 14.14 Percentage of median disposable household income 43.14 Percentage of median disposable household income 29 Percentage of median disposable household income Japan
2020s 11.6 Percentage of median disposable household income 42.6 Percentage of median disposable household income 31 Percentage of median disposable household income Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of, Croatia or Japan?
Japan, at 42 Percentage of median disposable household income against 14 Percentage of median disposable household income in Croatia as of 2024.
What is the difference in adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of between Croatia and Japan?
28 Percentage of median disposable household income, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Japan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
How do Croatia and Japan rank globally for adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of?
Croatia ranks 2nd and Japan ranks 4th of 3 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of selected jobless families that claim minimum income benefits. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Japan: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adequacy-of-minimum-income-benefits-net-annualised-income-of-selected-jobless-families/croatia-2/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adequacy-of-minimum-income-benefits-net-annualised-income-of-selected-jobless-families/croatia-2/japan/">Croatia vs Japan: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of selected jobless families that claim minimum income benefits
Unit
Percentage of median disposable household income
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
41 places, 934 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

This indicator measures the income of selected jobless families receiving Minimum Income benefits. Values are expressed both in national currency and as a percentage of the median disposable income in the country. When the country's poverty line is defined as a fixed percentage of the median disposable income, the normalization of benefit amounts in terms of the median disposable income allows measuring the gap between benefit entitlements and the poverty line. For instance, if the poverty threshold is 50% of the median disposable income, a value of the indicator of 30% means that benefit entitlements are 20 percentage points below the poverty line. Calculations for families with children assume 2 children aged 4 and 6 who do not use formal childcare.