Australia vs Japan: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of

Australia
38 Percentage of median disposable household income
in 2025
Japan
42 Percentage of median disposable household income
in 2024
Australia rank
7th
Japan rank
4th

Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of over time

  • Australia
  • Japan
01020304050200120132025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 42 Percentage of median disposable household income against 38 Percentage of median disposable household income in Australia, a difference of 4 Percentage of median disposable household income.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 7th and Japan ranks 4th of 31 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 42.56 Percentage of median disposable household income 42.89 Percentage of median disposable household income 0.3333 Percentage of median disposable household income Japan
2010s 35.9 Percentage of median disposable household income 43.5 Percentage of median disposable household income 7.6 Percentage of median disposable household income Japan
2020s 37 Percentage of median disposable household income 42.6 Percentage of median disposable household income 5.6 Percentage of median disposable household income Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of, Australia or Japan?
Japan, at 42 Percentage of median disposable household income against 38 Percentage of median disposable household income in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of between Australia and Japan?
4 Percentage of median disposable household income, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Japan?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Australia and Japan rank globally for adequacy of minimum income benefits — net annualised income of?
Australia ranks 7th and Japan ranks 4th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of selected jobless families that claim minimum income benefits. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Japan: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adequacy-of-minimum-income-benefits-net-annualised-income-of-selected-jobless-families/australia/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adequacy-of-minimum-income-benefits-net-annualised-income-of-selected-jobless-families/australia/japan/">Australia vs Japan: Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of minimum income benefits — Net annualised income of selected jobless families that claim minimum income benefits
Unit
Percentage of median disposable household income
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
41 places, 934 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

This indicator measures the income of selected jobless families receiving Minimum Income benefits. Values are expressed both in national currency and as a percentage of the median disposable income in the country. When the country's poverty line is defined as a fixed percentage of the median disposable income, the normalization of benefit amounts in terms of the median disposable income allows measuring the gap between benefit entitlements and the poverty line. For instance, if the poverty threshold is 50% of the median disposable income, a value of the indicator of 30% means that benefit entitlements are 20 percentage points below the poverty line. Calculations for families with children assume 2 children aged 4 and 6 who do not use formal childcare.