Luxembourg vs Paraguay: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk over time
- Luxembourg
- Paraguay
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 10 % against 9 % in Paraguay, a difference of 1 %.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 47th and Paraguay ranks 48th of 120 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7 % | 0 % | 7 % | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 10 % | 6.33 % | 3.67 % | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 10 % | 7.67 % | 2.33 % | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk, Luxembourg or Paraguay?
- Luxembourg, at 10 % against 9 % in Paraguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk between Luxembourg and Paraguay?
- 1 %, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Paraguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Luxembourg and Paraguay rank globally for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- Luxembourg ranks 47th and Paraguay ranks 48th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.