Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Republic of Korea: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
11.58 %
in 2025
Republic of Korea
29 %
in 2025
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
23rd
Republic of Korea rank
24th

2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Republic of Korea
0102030200020122025

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 29 % against 11.58 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 17.42 %.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 2.5 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 23rd and Republic of Korea ranks 24th of 29 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 16.11 % 0 % 16.11 % Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 18.83 % 0 % 18.83 % Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 11.23 % 29 % 17.77 % Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Republic of Korea?
Republic of Korea, at 29 % against 11.58 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Republic of Korea?
17.42 %, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Republic of Korea?
16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Republic of Korea rank globally for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 23rd and Republic of Korea ranks 24th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Republic of Korea: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/republic-of-korea/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Republic of Korea: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
158 places, 2,975 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.