Italy vs Lithuania: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk

Italy
29 %
in 2025
Lithuania
29 %
in 2025
Italy rank
24th
Lithuania rank
24th

2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk over time

  • Italy
  • Lithuania
20406080100200020122025

How they compare

Italy currently reports 29 % against 29 % in Lithuania, a difference of 0 %.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.

Italy ranks 24th and Lithuania ranks 24th of 120 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 18.7 % 45.4 % 26.7 % Lithuania
2010s 22.14 % 47.14 % 25 % Lithuania
2020s 30.5 % 28.33 % 2.17 % Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk, Italy or Lithuania?
Italy, at 29 % against 29 % in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk between Italy and Lithuania?
0 %, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Lithuania?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Italy and Lithuania rank globally for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
Italy ranks 24th and Lithuania ranks 24th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Lithuania: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/italy/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/italy/lithuania/">Italy vs Lithuania: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
158 places, 2,975 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.