Northern Europe vs Polynesia: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value over time
- Northern Europe
- Polynesia
How they compare
Northern Europe currently reports 184 No against 38 No in Polynesia, a difference of 146 No.
That makes Northern Europe's figure about 4.8 times Polynesia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Northern Europe has been ahead every year.
Northern Europe ranks 6th and Polynesia ranks 9th of 33 groups.
Northern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Europe | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.6 No | 14.8 No | 49.8 No | Northern Europe |
| 2010s | 178.8 No | 34.6 No | 144.2 No | Northern Europe |
| 2020s | 182.17 No | 37 No | 145.17 No | Northern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value, Northern Europe or Polynesia?
- Northern Europe, at 184 No against 38 No in Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value between Northern Europe and Polynesia?
- 146 No, with Northern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Europe and Polynesia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Northern Europe and Polynesia rank globally for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value?
- Northern Europe ranks 6th and Polynesia ranks 9th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.