Chile vs Philippines: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value

Chile
78 No
in 2025
Philippines
73 No
in 2025
Chile rank
5th
Philippines rank
8th

2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value over time

  • Chile
  • Philippines
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 78 No against 73 No in Philippines, a difference of 5 No.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 5th and Philippines ranks 8th of 180 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 43.4 No 26.8 No 16.6 No Chile
2010s 80.3 No 70 No 10.3 No Chile
2020s 77.5 No 73 No 4.5 No Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value, Chile or Philippines?
Chile, at 78 No against 73 No in Philippines as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value between Chile and Philippines?
5 No, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Philippines?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Chile and Philippines rank globally for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — value?
Chile ranks 5th and Philippines ranks 8th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Philippines: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-transboundary-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-value/chile/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-transboundary-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-value/chile/philippines/">Chile vs Philippines: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
230 places, 5,756 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.