Brazil vs Oman: 2.5.2 Number: Value, per unit of GDP … unit GDP not
Brazil
0 No per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Oman
0 No per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Brazil rank
150th
Oman rank
149th
2.5.2 Number: Value, per unit of GDP … unit GDP not over time
- Brazil
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0 No per US$ of GDP against 0 No per US$ of GDP in Brazil, a difference of 0 No per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Oman ahead.
Brazil ranks 150th and Oman ranks 149th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Oman |
| 2010s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Oman |
| 2020s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per unit, Brazil or Oman?
- Oman, at 0 No per US$ of GDP against 0 No per US$ of GDP in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per unit between Brazil and Oman?
- 0 No per US$ of GDP, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Oman?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Oman rank globally for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per unit?
- Brazil ranks 150th and Oman ranks 149th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.