Libya vs Sudan: 2.5.2 Number: Value, per square kilometre
Libya
0 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan
0 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
161st
Sudan rank
163rd
2.5.2 Number: Value, per square kilometre over time
- Libya
- Sudan
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 No per square kilometre against 0 No per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0 No per square kilometre.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.6 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Libya ranks 161st and Sudan ranks 163rd of 165 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per, Libya or Sudan?
- Libya, at 0 No per square kilometre against 0 No per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per between Libya and Sudan?
- 0 No per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Sudan rank globally for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per?
- Libya ranks 161st and Sudan ranks 163rd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.