How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.2 Number: Value, per square kilometre

Chile

0.0001 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0.0001 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

101st

Zimbabwe rank

98th

2.5.2 Number: Value, per square kilometre over time

Chile
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0001 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 No per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0 No per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 98th of 165 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2020s	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per, Chile or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0.0001 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 No per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per between Chile and Zimbabwe?: 0 No per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per?: Chile ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 98th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-transboundary-breeds-not-extinct-value-per-square-kilometre/chile/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-transboundary-breeds-not-extinct-value-per-square-kilometre/chile/zimbabwe/">Chile vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 3,828 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.