Antigua and Barbuda vs Sub-Saharan Africa: 2.5.2 Number: Value, per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0909 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
0 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
2nd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
1st

2.5.2 Number: Value, per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
00.020.040.060.080.1200020112023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0909 No per square kilometre against 0 No per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.0909 No per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 6,173.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 2nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 165 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0486 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre 0.0486 No per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0909 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre 0.0909 No per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.0909 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre 0.0909 No per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per, Antigua and Barbuda or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0909 No per square kilometre against 0 No per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per between Antigua and Barbuda and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0.0909 No per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Sub-Saharan Africa?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 2nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Sub-Saharan Africa: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-transboundary-breeds-not-extinct-value-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-transboundary-breeds-not-extinct-value-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/sub-saharan-africa/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Sub-Saharan Africa: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 3,828 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.