Poland vs Zambia: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita
Poland
0 No per person
in 2025
Zambia
0 No per person
in 2025
Poland rank
112th
Zambia rank
114th
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita over time
- Poland
- Zambia
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Zambia, a difference of 0 No per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 114th of 167 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita, Poland or Zambia?
- Poland, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita between Poland and Zambia?
- 0 No per person, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Poland and Zambia rank globally for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita?
- Poland ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 114th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.