Iceland vs Vanuatu: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita
Iceland
0 No per person
in 2025
Vanuatu
0 No per person
in 2025
Iceland rank
35th
Vanuatu rank
36th
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita over time
- Iceland
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Vanuatu, a difference of 0 No per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Iceland ranks 35th and Vanuatu ranks 36th of 167 countries.
Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita, Iceland or Vanuatu?
- Iceland, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Vanuatu as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita between Iceland and Vanuatu?
- 0 No per person, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Vanuatu?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Vanuatu rank globally for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita?
- Iceland ranks 35th and Vanuatu ranks 36th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.