Ghana vs Lebanon: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita
Ghana
0 No per person
in 2025
Lebanon
0 No per person
in 2025
Ghana rank
132nd
Lebanon rank
134th
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita over time
- Ghana
- Lebanon
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Lebanon, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 132nd and Lebanon ranks 134th of 167 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Ghana |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita, Ghana or Lebanon?
- Ghana, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Lebanon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita between Ghana and Lebanon?
- 0 No per person, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Lebanon?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Lebanon rank globally for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita?
- Ghana ranks 132nd and Lebanon ranks 134th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.