Gambia vs Libya: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita
Gambia
0 No per person
in 2025
Libya
0 No per person
in 2025
Gambia rank
103rd
Libya rank
105th
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita over time
- Gambia
- Libya
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Libya, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 103rd and Libya ranks 105th of 167 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita, Gambia or Libya?
- Gambia, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita between Gambia and Libya?
- 0 No per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Libya?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Gambia and Libya rank globally for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita?
- Gambia ranks 103rd and Libya ranks 105th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.