Eswatini vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): 2.5.2 Number: Value, annual growth rate … not annual growth rate

Eswatini
5.26 % change on previous year
in 2025
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0.7673 % change on previous year
in 2025
Eswatini rank
6th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
6th

2.5.2 Number: Value, annual growth rate … not annual growth rate over time

  • Eswatini
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
050100150200120132025

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 5.26 % change on previous year against 0.7673 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 4.49 % change on previous year.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 6.9 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Eswatini ranks 6th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 6th of 194 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 13.73 % change on previous year 22.25 % change on previous year 8.51 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —
2020s 0.8772 % change on previous year 1.74 % change on previous year 0.8667 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, annual, Eswatini or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Eswatini, at 5.26 % change on previous year against 0.7673 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, annual between Eswatini and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
4.49 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, annual?
Eswatini ranks 6th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 6th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-transboundary-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-transboundary-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Eswatini vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 5,493 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.