Costa Rica vs Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand: 2.5.2 Number: Value, annual growth rate … not annual growth rate

Costa Rica
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
10th
Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand rank
8th

2.5.2 Number: Value, annual growth rate … not annual growth rate over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand
0200400600200120132025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 10th and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th of 194 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 51.43 % change on previous year 106.67 % change on previous year 55.24 % change on previous year Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —
2020s 3.16 % change on previous year 0.8772 % change on previous year 2.29 % change on previous year Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, annual, Costa Rica or Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
Costa Rica, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, annual between Costa Rica and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
0 % change on previous year, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand rank globally for 2.5.2 number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — value, annual?
Costa Rica ranks 10th and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-transboundary-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/oceania-excluding-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-transboundary-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/oceania-excluding-australia-and-new-zealand/">Costa Rica vs Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand: 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 5,493 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.2 Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.