How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … unknown square

Rwanda

0.0002 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Sri Lanka

0.0003 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Rwanda rank

49th

Sri Lanka rank

48th

2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … unknown square over time

Rwanda
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0003 No per square kilometre against 0.0002 No per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0001 No per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 49th and Sri Lanka ranks 48th of 162 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Rwanda	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0004 No per square kilometre	0.0003 No per square kilometre	0.0001 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2010s	0.0004 No per square kilometre	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0.0002 No per square kilometre	Rwanda
2020s	0.0003 No per square kilometre	0.0003 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?: Sri Lanka, at 0.0003 No per square kilometre against 0.0002 No per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?: 0.0001 No per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per?: Rwanda ranks 49th and Sri Lanka ranks 48th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-value-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-value-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/">Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 164 places, 3,719 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.