Malawi vs Zambia: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per capita … unknown capita
Malawi
0 No per person
in 2025
Zambia
0 No per person
in 2025
Malawi rank
90th
Zambia rank
93rd
2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per capita … unknown capita over time
- Malawi
- Zambia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Zambia, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zambia ahead.
Malawi ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 93rd of 164 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per, Malawi or Zambia?
- Malawi, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per between Malawi and Zambia?
- 0 No per person, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Zambia rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per?
- Malawi ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 93rd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.