Benin vs Zambia: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per capita … unknown capita
Benin
0 No per person
in 2025
Zambia
0 No per person
in 2025
Benin rank
94th
Zambia rank
93rd
2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per capita … unknown capita over time
- Benin
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Benin, a difference of 0 No per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Benin ahead.
Benin ranks 94th and Zambia ranks 93rd of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Benin |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per, Benin or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Benin as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per between Benin and Zambia?
- 0 No per person, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Benin and Zambia rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, per?
- Benin ranks 94th and Zambia ranks 93rd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.