Latvia vs Serbia: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, annual growth rate … unknown annual
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2013
Serbia
-11.11 % change on previous year
in 2025
Latvia rank
178th
Serbia rank
177th
2.5.2 Number of local: Value, annual growth rate … unknown annual over time
- Latvia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports -11.11 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 88.89 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 178th and Serbia ranks 177th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.33 % change on previous year | -25 % change on previous year | 33.33 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2010s | -25 % change on previous year | -7.14 % change on previous year | 17.86 % change on previous year | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, annual, Latvia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at -11.11 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, annual between Latvia and Serbia?
- 88.89 % change on previous year, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, annual?
- Latvia ranks 178th and Serbia ranks 177th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.