Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mexico: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, annual growth rate … unknown annual

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2.9 % change on previous year
in 2025
Mexico
5.56 % change on previous year
in 2025
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
13th
Mexico rank
12th

2.5.2 Number of local: Value, annual growth rate … unknown annual over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Mexico
0200400600800200120132025

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 5.56 % change on previous year against 2.9 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 2.66 % change on previous year.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.9 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mexico ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 13th and Mexico ranks 12th of 34 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s 56.67 % change on previous year 101.85 % change on previous year 45.19 % change on previous year Mexico
2010s 0.5132 % change on previous year 0.0733 % change on previous year 0.44 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 2.96 % change on previous year 7.52 % change on previous year 4.56 % change on previous year Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, annual, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Mexico?
Mexico, at 5.56 % change on previous year against 2.9 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, annual between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mexico?
2.66 % change on previous year, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mexico?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mexico rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, annual?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 13th and Mexico ranks 12th of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mexico: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-value-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-with-unknown-risk-status-value-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mexico/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mexico: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 4,830 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.