Czechia vs Latvia: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, annual growth rate … unknown annual
Czechia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2013
Czechia rank
178th
Latvia rank
178th
2.5.2 Number of local: Value, annual growth rate … unknown annual over time
- Czechia
- Latvia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 178th and Latvia ranks 178th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 223.75 % change on previous year | 37.5 % change on previous year | 186.25 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 2010s | -26.98 % change on previous year | -25 % change on previous year | 1.98 % change on previous year | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, annual, Czechia or Latvia?
- Czechia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, annual between Czechia and Latvia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Latvia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2013.
- How do Czechia and Latvia rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, annual?
- Czechia ranks 178th and Latvia ranks 178th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.