Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, annual growth rate … unknown annual
2.5.2 Number of local: Value, annual growth rate … unknown annual over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
How they compare
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 2 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 2 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 19th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 146.95 % change on previous year | 55.63 % change on previous year | 91.32 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.6453 % change on previous year | -0.1751 % change on previous year | 0.8205 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | -11.94 % change on previous year | 0.4635 % change on previous year | 12.4 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, annual, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 2 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, annual between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- 2 % change on previous year, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds with unknown risk status — value, annual?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 19th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.2 Number of local breeds with unknown risk status — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.