Guatemala vs New Zealand: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … not square

Guatemala
0.0002 No per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0002 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
74th
New Zealand rank
76th

2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … not square over time

  • Guatemala
  • New Zealand
0000200020112023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0002 No per square kilometre against 0.0002 No per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0 No per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.

Guatemala ranks 74th and New Zealand ranks 76th of 162 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre 0.0001 No per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.0002 No per square kilometre 0.0001 No per square kilometre 0.0001 No per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.0002 No per square kilometre 0.0001 No per square kilometre 0.0001 No per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square, Guatemala or New Zealand?
Guatemala, at 0.0002 No per square kilometre against 0.0002 No per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square between Guatemala and New Zealand?
0 No per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and New Zealand?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and New Zealand rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square?
Guatemala ranks 74th and New Zealand ranks 76th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs New Zealand: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/new-zealand/">Guatemala vs New Zealand: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 3,719 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.