Central African Republic vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … not square

Central African Republic
0 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
150th
Zimbabwe rank
152nd

2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … not square over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Zimbabwe
0000200020112023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0 No per square kilometre against 0 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 No per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 152nd of 162 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 0 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 0 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square, Central African Republic or Zimbabwe?
Central African Republic, at 0 No per square kilometre against 0 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square between Central African Republic and Zimbabwe?
0 No per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Zimbabwe?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square?
Central African Republic ranks 150th and Zimbabwe ranks 152nd of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/zimbabwe/">Central African Republic vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 3,719 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.