Cambodia vs Panama: 2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … not square
Cambodia
0.0001 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
0.0001 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
96th
Panama rank
95th
2.5.2 Number of local: Value, per square kilometre … not square over time
- Cambodia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0.0001 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 No per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 0 No per square kilometre.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 96th and Panama ranks 95th of 162 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 No per square kilometre | 0.0001 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | Panama |
| 2010s | 0.0001 No per square kilometre | 0.0001 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | Panama |
| 2020s | 0.0001 No per square kilometre | 0.0001 No per square kilometre | 0 No per square kilometre | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square, Cambodia or Panama?
- Panama, at 0.0001 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 No per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square between Cambodia and Panama?
- 0 No per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Panama?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Panama rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per square?
- Cambodia ranks 96th and Panama ranks 95th of 162 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.