Sri Lanka vs Sudan: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita (not)
Sri Lanka
0 No per person
in 2025
Sudan
0 No per person
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
111th
Sudan rank
110th
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita (not) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 No per person.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 111th and Sudan ranks 110th of 164 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Sudan |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita, Sri Lanka or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita between Sri Lanka and Sudan?
- 0 No per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sudan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and Sudan rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita?
- Sri Lanka ranks 111th and Sudan ranks 110th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.