Malta vs Portugal: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita (not)
Malta
0 No per person
in 2025
Portugal
0 No per person
in 2025
Malta rank
55th
Portugal rank
58th
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita (not) over time
- Malta
- Portugal
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Portugal, a difference of 0 No per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 55th and Portugal ranks 58th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Portugal |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita, Malta or Portugal?
- Malta, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Portugal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita between Malta and Portugal?
- 0 No per person, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Portugal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Malta and Portugal rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita?
- Malta ranks 55th and Portugal ranks 58th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.