Finland vs Serbia: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita (not)
Finland
0 No per person
in 2025
Serbia
0 No per person
in 2025
Finland rank
77th
Serbia rank
80th
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita (not) over time
- Finland
- Serbia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Serbia, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 77th and Serbia ranks 80th of 164 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Finland |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Finland |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita, Finland or Serbia?
- Finland, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita between Finland and Serbia?
- 0 No per person, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Serbia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Serbia rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita?
- Finland ranks 77th and Serbia ranks 80th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.