Croatia vs Latvia: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita (not)
Croatia
0 No per person
in 2025
Latvia
0 No per person
in 2025
Croatia rank
33rd
Latvia rank
35th
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita (not) over time
- Croatia
- Latvia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Latvia, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 33rd and Latvia ranks 35th of 164 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita, Croatia or Latvia?
- Croatia, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita between Croatia and Latvia?
- 0 No per person, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 33rd and Latvia ranks 35th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.