Australia vs Mali: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita (not)
Australia
0 No per person
in 2025
Mali
0 No per person
in 2025
Australia rank
82nd
Mali rank
85th
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita (not) over time
- Australia
- Mali
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Mali, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 82nd and Mali ranks 85th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Mali |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Mali |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita, Australia or Mali?
- Australia, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Mali as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita between Australia and Mali?
- 0 No per person, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mali?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Mali rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, per capita?
- Australia ranks 82nd and Mali ranks 85th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.