Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Malawi: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1.11 % change on previous year
in 2025
Malawi
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
14th
Malawi rank
16th

2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Malawi
0100200300200120132025

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 1.11 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Malawi, a difference of 1.11 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 14th and Malawi ranks 16th of 34 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Malawi Difference Ahead
2000s 23.8 % change on previous year 30.56 % change on previous year 6.75 % change on previous year Malawi
2010s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 1.44 % change on previous year 1.11 % change on previous year 0.3261 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Malawi?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 1.11 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Malawi as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Malawi?
1.11 % change on previous year, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Malawi?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Malawi rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 14th and Malawi ranks 16th of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Malawi: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/malawi/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Malawi: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 5,333 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.