Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Sri Lanka: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.79 % change on previous year
in 2025
Sri Lanka
5.26 % change on previous year
in 2025
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
7th
Sri Lanka rank
10th

2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Sri Lanka
050100150200200120132025

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 5.26 % change on previous year against 1.79 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 3.47 % change on previous year.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 2.9 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th and Sri Lanka ranks 10th of 34 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2000s 24.39 % change on previous year 10 % change on previous year 14.39 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0.0299 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.0299 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 2.96 % change on previous year 0.8772 % change on previous year 2.08 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 5.26 % change on previous year against 1.79 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Sri Lanka?
3.47 % change on previous year, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Sri Lanka?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Sri Lanka rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th and Sri Lanka ranks 10th of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Sri Lanka: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/sri-lanka/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Sri Lanka: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 5,333 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.