Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Nigeria: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.79 % change on previous year
in 2025
Nigeria
18.75 % change on previous year
in 2025
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
7th
Nigeria rank
5th

2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Nigeria
050100150200200120132025

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 18.75 % change on previous year against 1.79 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 16.96 % change on previous year.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 10.5 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th and Nigeria ranks 5th of 34 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Nigeria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Nigeria Difference Ahead
2000s 2.94 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 2.94 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0.0299 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.0299 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 2.96 % change on previous year 3.12 % change on previous year 0.1679 % change on previous year Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 18.75 % change on previous year against 1.79 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Nigeria?
16.96 % change on previous year, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Nigeria?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Nigeria rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th and Nigeria ranks 5th of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Nigeria: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/nigeria/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Nigeria: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 5,333 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.