Bhutan vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate

Bhutan
20 % change on previous year
in 2025
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.79 % change on previous year
in 2025
Bhutan rank
4th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
7th

2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate over time

  • Bhutan
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
050100150200200120132025

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 20 % change on previous year against 1.79 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 18.21 % change on previous year.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 11.2 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Bhutan ranks 4th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 0 % change on previous year 2.94 % change on previous year 2.94 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0 % change on previous year 0.0299 % change on previous year 0.0299 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 3.33 % change on previous year 2.96 % change on previous year 0.3762 % change on previous year Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate, Bhutan or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Bhutan, at 20 % change on previous year against 1.79 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate between Bhutan and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
18.21 % change on previous year, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Bhutan and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate?
Bhutan ranks 4th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/bhutan/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/bhutan/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Bhutan vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 5,333 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.