Australia and New Zealand vs Latvia: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate

Australia and New Zealand
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Latvia
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
16th
Latvia rank
16th

2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Latvia
0100200300200120132025

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Latvia ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 16th of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 32.48 % change on previous year 13.97 % change on previous year 18.51 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2010s -0.1429 % change on previous year 0.7692 % change on previous year 0.9121 % change on previous year Latvia
2020s 13.37 % change on previous year 4.76 % change on previous year 8.61 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Latvia?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Latvia?
0 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Latvia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Latvia rank globally for 2.5.2 number of local breeds (not extinct) — value, annual growth rate?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 16th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Latvia: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-2-number-of-local-breeds-not-extinct-value-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/latvia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Latvia: 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 5,333 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.2 Number of local breeds (not extinct) — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.