Eastern Europe vs Polynesia: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value over time
- Eastern Europe
- Polynesia
How they compare
Eastern Europe currently reports 321 No against 38 No in Polynesia, a difference of 283 No.
That makes Eastern Europe's figure about 8.4 times Polynesia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Eastern Europe has been ahead every year.
Eastern Europe ranks 11th and Polynesia ranks 10th of 33 groups.
Eastern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Europe | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 231.6 No | 15.4 No | 216.2 No | Eastern Europe |
| 2010s | 313.1 No | 35 No | 278.1 No | Eastern Europe |
| 2020s | 317 No | 37 No | 280 No | Eastern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — value, Eastern Europe or Polynesia?
- Eastern Europe, at 321 No against 38 No in Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — value between Eastern Europe and Polynesia?
- 283 No, with Eastern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Polynesia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Eastern Europe and Polynesia rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — value?
- Eastern Europe ranks 11th and Polynesia ranks 10th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.