Latvia vs Panama: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 No per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Panama
0 No per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Latvia rank
80th
Panama rank
77th
2.5.1b Number: Value, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0 No per US$ of GDP against 0 No per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 No per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Panama ahead.
Latvia ranks 80th and Panama ranks 77th of 167 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2010s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2020s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Latvia or Panama?
- Panama, at 0 No per US$ of GDP against 0 No per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Latvia and Panama?
- 0 No per US$ of GDP, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Panama rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Latvia ranks 80th and Panama ranks 77th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.