Eritrea vs Grenada: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 No per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Grenada
0 No per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Eritrea rank
16th
Grenada rank
17th
2.5.1b Number: Value, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Grenada
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 No per US$ of GDP against 0 No per US$ of GDP in Grenada, a difference of 0 No per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.4 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 16th and Grenada ranks 17th of 167 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Eritrea or Grenada?
- Eritrea, at 0 No per US$ of GDP against 0 No per US$ of GDP in Grenada as of 2011.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Eritrea and Grenada?
- 0 No per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Grenada?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Grenada rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Eritrea ranks 16th and Grenada ranks 17th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.