Cuba vs Uganda: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per unit of GDP
Cuba
0 No per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Uganda
0 No per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Cuba rank
73rd
Uganda rank
72nd
2.5.1b Number: Value, per unit of GDP over time
- Cuba
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0 No per US$ of GDP against 0 No per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0 No per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uganda ahead.
Cuba ranks 73rd and Uganda ranks 72nd of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Cuba or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0 No per US$ of GDP against 0 No per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Cuba and Uganda?
- 0 No per US$ of GDP, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Uganda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Uganda rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Cuba ranks 73rd and Uganda ranks 72nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.