How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Tuvalu?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tuvalu: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre

Sub-Saharan Africa

0 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Tuvalu

0.1667 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Sub-Saharan Africa rank

1st

Tuvalu rank

1st

2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre over time

Sub-Saharan Africa
Tuvalu

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 0.1667 No per square kilometre against 0 No per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.1667 No per square kilometre.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 2 groups.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sub-Saharan Africa	Tuvalu	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 No per square kilometre	0.1667 No per square kilometre	0.1667 No per square kilometre	Tuvalu
2010s	0 No per square kilometre	0.1667 No per square kilometre	0.1667 No per square kilometre	Tuvalu
2020s	0 No per square kilometre	0.1667 No per square kilometre	0.1667 No per square kilometre	Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Sub-Saharan Africa or Tuvalu?: Tuvalu, at 0.1667 No per square kilometre against 0 No per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Sub-Saharan Africa and Tuvalu?: 0.1667 No per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Tuvalu?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Tuvalu rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?: Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Tuvalu ranks 1st of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tuvalu: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/tuvalu/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tuvalu: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 3,832 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.