How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre

Malta

0.0219 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Sao Tome and Principe

0.0229 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Malta rank

14th

Sao Tome and Principe rank

13th

2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre over time

Malta
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.0229 No per square kilometre against 0.0219 No per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.001 No per square kilometre.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 14th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 13th of 165 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Sao Tome and Principe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0156 No per square kilometre	0.0229 No per square kilometre	0.0073 No per square kilometre	Sao Tome and Principe
2010s	0.0156 No per square kilometre	0.0229 No per square kilometre	0.0073 No per square kilometre	Sao Tome and Principe
2020s	0.0172 No per square kilometre	0.0229 No per square kilometre	0.0057 No per square kilometre	Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Malta or Sao Tome and Principe?: Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0229 No per square kilometre against 0.0219 No per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?: 0.001 No per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Malta and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?: Malta ranks 14th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 13th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-per-square-kilometre/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-per-square-kilometre/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/">Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 3,832 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.