Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre

Kyrgyzstan
0.0001 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0001 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan rank
103rd
Zimbabwe rank
100th

2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Zimbabwe
00000200020112023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0001 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 No per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 No per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd and Zimbabwe ranks 100th of 165 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 No per square kilometre 0.0001 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan
2010s 0.0001 No per square kilometre 0.0001 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0001 No per square kilometre 0.0001 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Kyrgyzstan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0001 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 No per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
0 No per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd and Zimbabwe ranks 100th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β€” Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/zimbabwe/">Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β€” Value, per square kilometre
Unit
No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 3,832 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β€” Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.