How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Namibia: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre

Iceland

0.0001 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

0.0001 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Iceland rank

120th

Namibia rank

118th

2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre over time

Iceland
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0001 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 No per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0 No per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 120th and Namibia ranks 118th of 165 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Iceland
2010s	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Namibia
2020s	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Iceland or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.0001 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 No per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Iceland and Namibia?: 0 No per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?: Iceland ranks 120th and Namibia ranks 118th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Namibia: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/">Iceland vs Namibia: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 3,832 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.