How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Chile?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burkina Faso vs Chile: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre

Burkina Faso

0.0001 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile

0.0001 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Burkina Faso rank

101st

Chile rank

102nd

2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre over time

Burkina Faso
Chile

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.0001 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 No per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0 No per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 101st and Chile ranks 102nd of 165 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burkina Faso	Chile	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Chile
2010s	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Chile
2020s	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Burkina Faso or Chile?: Burkina Faso, at 0.0001 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 No per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Burkina Faso and Chile?: 0 No per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Chile?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Chile rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?: Burkina Faso ranks 101st and Chile ranks 102nd of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Chile: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/chile/">Burkina Faso vs Chile: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 3,832 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.