How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Namibia?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Namibia: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre

Belarus

0.0001 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

0.0001 No per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

117th

Namibia rank

118th

2.5.1b Number: Value, per square kilometre over time

Belarus
Namibia

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0001 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 No per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0 No per square kilometre.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 118th of 165 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Belarus
2020s	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0.0001 No per square kilometre	0 No per square kilometre	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Belarus or Namibia?: Belarus, at 0.0001 No per square kilometre against 0.0001 No per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Belarus and Namibia?: 0 No per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Namibia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Namibia rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?: Belarus ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 118th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Namibia: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-per-square-kilometre/belarus/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-per-square-kilometre/belarus/namibia/">Belarus vs Namibia: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, per square kilometre
Unit: No per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 3,832 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.