Mexico vs Somalia: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita
Mexico
0 No per person
in 2025
Somalia
0 No per person
in 2025
Mexico rank
143rd
Somalia rank
146th
2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita over time
- Mexico
- Somalia
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Somalia, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Somalia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Somalia ahead.
Mexico ranks 143rd and Somalia ranks 146th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Somalia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Somalia |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Somalia |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Mexico or Somalia?
- Mexico, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Somalia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Mexico and Somalia?
- 0 No per person, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Somalia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Mexico and Somalia rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Mexico ranks 143rd and Somalia ranks 146th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.