Malawi vs Zambia: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita
Malawi
0 No per person
in 2025
Zambia
0 No per person
in 2025
Malawi rank
116th
Zambia rank
114th
2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita over time
- Malawi
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Malawi, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 116th and Zambia ranks 114th of 167 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Malawi or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Malawi and Zambia?
- 0 No per person, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Zambia rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Malawi ranks 116th and Zambia ranks 114th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.